zlacker

[return to "Ilya Sutskever "at the center" of Altman firing?"]
1. rcpt+a1[view] [source] 2023-11-18 02:50:39
>>apsec1+(OP)
Wait this is just a corporate turf war? That's boring I already have those at work
◧◩
2. reduce+s1[view] [source] 2023-11-18 02:52:52
>>rcpt+a1
No, this move is so drastic because Ilya, the chief scientist behind OpenAI, thinks Sam and Greg are pushing so hard on AGI capabilities, ahead of alignment with humanity, that it threatens everyone. 2/3 of the other board members agreed.

Don’t shoot the messenger. No one else has given you a plausible reason why Sama was abruptly fired, and this is what a reporter said of Ilya:

‘He freaked the hell out of people there. And we’re talking about AI professionals who work in the biggest AI labs in the Bay area. They were leaving the room, saying, “Holy shit.”

The point is that Ilya Sutskever took what you see in the media, the “AGI utopia vs. potential apocalypse” ideology, to the next level. It was traumatizing.’

https://www.aipanic.news/p/what-ilya-sutskever-really-wants

◧◩◪
3. gnulin+74[view] [source] 2023-11-18 03:12:54
>>reduce+s1
Haha yeah no I don't believe this. They're nowhere near AGI, even if it's possible at all to be there with the current tech we have, which is unconvincing. I don't believe professionals who work in biggest AI labs are spooked by GPT. I need more evidence to believe something like that sorry. It sounds a lot more like Sam Altman lied to the board.
◧◩◪◨
4. spacem+qa[view] [source] 2023-11-18 03:58:26
>>gnulin+74
We barely understand the human brain, but sure we’re super close to AGI because we made chat bots that don’t completely suck anymore. It’s such hubris. Are the tools cool? Undoubtedly. But come down to earth for a second. People have lost all objectivity.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. MVisse+2f[view] [source] 2023-11-18 04:34:02
>>spacem+qa
Objectively speaking, we’re talking exponential growth in both compute and capabilities year over year.

Do you have any data that shows that we’ll plateau any time soon?

Because if this trend continues, we’ll have superhuman levels of compute within 5 years.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. spacem+3n5[view] [source] 2023-11-19 17:23:50
>>MVisse+2f
I’m pretty sure you have no data showing we’re heading to AGI because “compute and capabilities” is about as nebulous as it gets. You can’t just throw CPU cycles to strong arm your way to a solution to a problem you barely understand to begin with.
[go to top]