zlacker

[return to "OpenAI's board has fired Sam Altman"]
1. baidif+aq[view] [source] 2023-11-17 22:16:39
>>davidb+(OP)
- Cant be a personal scandal, press release would be worded much more differently

- Board is mostly independent and those independent dont have equity

- They talk about not being candid - this is legalese for “lying”

The only major thing that could warrant something like this is Sam going behind the boards back to make a decision (or make progress on a decision) that is misaligned with the Charter. Thats the only fireable offense that warrants this language.

My bet: Sam initiated some commercial agreement (like a sale) to an entity that would have violated the “open” nature of the company. Likely he pursued a sale to Microsoft without the board knowing.

◧◩
2. podnam+js[view] [source] 2023-11-17 22:27:17
>>baidif+aq
Doesn’t make any sense. He is ideologically driven - why would he risk a once in a lifetime opportunity for a mere sale?

Desperate times calls for desperate measures. This is a swift way for OpenAI to shield the business from something which is a PR disaster, probably something which would make Sam persona non grata in any business context.

◧◩◪
3. smcleo+8D[view] [source] 2023-11-17 23:18:11
>>podnam+js
I highly doubt he's ideologically driven. He's as much of a VC loving silicon valley tech-bro as the next. The company has been anything but "open".
◧◩◪◨
4. freedo+HE[view] [source] 2023-11-17 23:25:18
>>smcleo+8D
He doesn't have equity, so what would be driving him if not ideology?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. enonim+1I[view] [source] 2023-11-17 23:40:17
>>freedo+HE
He would own roughly 10% of https://worldcoin.org/ which aims to be the non-corruptible source of digital identity in the age of AI.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. chx+aO[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:11:47
>>enonim+1I
You need to read https://web3isgoinggreat.com/ more
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. enonim+YS[view] [source] 2023-11-18 00:31:16
>>chx+aO
I'm web3 neutral, but this is relevant because:

1. Sam Altman started this company

2. He and other founders would benefit enormously if this was the way to solve the issue that AI raises, namely, "are you a human?"

3. Their mission statement:

> The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence has accelerated the need to differentiate between human- and AI-generated content online Proof of personhood addresses two of the key considerations presented by the Age of AI: (1) protecting against sybil attacks and (2) minimizing the spread of AI-generated misinformation World ID, an open and permissionless identity protocol, acts as a global digital passport and can be used anonymously to prove uniqueness and humanness as well as to selectively disclose credentials issued by other parties Worldcoin has published in-depth resources to provide more details about proof of personhood and World ID

[go to top]