zlacker

>>davidb+(OP)
I know I won't get a lot of love for this, but Sam is a really good person. I don't know him well, but I've known him since long before OpenAI.

He's not perfect, but behind the scenes he's a genuine and upstanding person. I've met lots of wealthy smart people, and he's the only exception. He was the only person I trusted in this situation, and I'm genuinely nervous that he's no longer running OpenAI.

>>gkober+B2
I agree. Have not heard a single concern about ethics in business ever raised about him before.

>>rogerk+k4
That's usually how things work. They're aren't any complaints or concerns, until they're are. Obviously.

>>Blackt+E5
Not really, no. There will usually be allegations of malfeasance floating around a person for a while before any of them are brought to the wider public. To a complete outsider, it looks like these things come out of nowhere, but to someone who's relatively close to the person it seems like it was building up for years. I've also noticed in cases of false accusations that there will often be a number of other accusations made shortly after, all of which look relatively weak or unimportant; eg someone accused of sexual harassment will separately be accused of making a sexual advancement then backing off when turned down. By evaluating the sorts of other allegations about a person when some accusation is made against them, we can attempt to guess the legitimacy of those allegations collectively.

>>bensec+Ba
> Not really, no. There will usually be allegations of malfeasance floating around a person for a while before any of them are brought to the wider public.

You mean, exactly like there been, from Sam Altman's sister?