zlacker

[return to "Privacy is priceless, but Signal is expensive"]
1. Duneda+Z[view] [source] 2023-11-16 16:22:44
>>mikece+(OP)
> Storage: $1.3 million dollars per year.

> Servers: $2.9 million dollars per year.

> Registration Fees: $6 million dollars per year.

> Total Bandwidth: $2.8 million dollars per year.

> Additional Services: $700,000 dollars per year.

Signal pays more for delivering verification SMS during sign-up, than for all other infrastructure (except traffic) combined. Wow, that sounds excessive.

◧◩
2. munk-a+58[view] [source] 2023-11-16 16:52:09
>>Duneda+Z
SMS rates are absolutely bonkers considering the technical way they're transmitted. The US is an outlier in SMS rates actually being reasonable (usually unlimited or close to) for consumers - but for the rest of the world the insane mark up on that communication method has mostly obsoleted it...

That'd be all well and good... the technology would die naturally, but all my American relatives continue to stubbornly use iMessage.

◧◩◪
3. lxgr+S9[view] [source] 2023-11-16 17:00:03
>>munk-a+58
> for the rest of the world the insane mark up on that communication method has mostly obsoleted it...

For P2P communication. SMS is alive and well for B2C messaging, most importantly for 2FA OTP delivery, but also as a first line of defense against spam/bot account creation.

It's not a good solution to either problem, but it's slightly better than nothing (which apparently makes it good enough for many), so I suspect we're stuck with it for now.

> That'd be all well and good... the technology would die naturally, but all my American relatives continue to stubbornly use iMessage.

iMessage is not SMS, though. It just uses phone numbers as identifiers, but so do many other popular over-the-top messengers, including the most popular one globally.

◧◩◪◨
4. munk-a+Wb[view] [source] 2023-11-16 17:07:57
>>lxgr+S9
To clarify - iMessage does not use SMS if you're going from Apple to Apple device and both devices have data/wifi available. iMessage refuses to support messaging to Android clients and defaults to SMS for these messages.

I've got an Android phone so all iMessage transmissions come across as SMS (or MMS).

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. lxgr+Nc[view] [source] 2023-11-16 17:11:22
>>munk-a+Wb
Ah, I see what you mean. That's not what I'd call iMessage though, that's just SMS:

The iOS application is called "Messages"; iMessage is the over-the-top Apple-exclusive messaging service.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. cmiles+Zf[view] [source] 2023-11-16 17:21:42
>>lxgr+Nc
Messages inflexible reliance on SMS for communication to non-Apple devices is definitely an Apple issue, in my opinion. Apple has made it clear that they continue to default to SMS for non-iPhone communication solely because it's unpleasant for everyone involved.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. JLCarv+en[view] [source] 2023-11-16 17:50:03
>>cmiles+Zf
https://www.android.com/get-the-message/
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. lxgr+4o[view] [source] 2023-11-16 17:53:04
>>JLCarv+en
RCS is Google's idea of a solution – a company not exactly widely known for their excellence in all things instant messaging.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. JLCarv+JJ[view] [source] 2023-11-16 19:34:03
>>lxgr+4o
Do you have a source that it was started by Google? From looking around, they support its development but it was an industry initiative, and Samsung was one of the first OEMs to support it.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦
10. kalleb+ed3[view] [source] 2023-11-17 14:10:19
>>JLCarv+JJ
It was embraced and extended by Google.
[go to top]