zlacker

[return to "Privacy is priceless, but Signal is expensive"]
1. Aissen+Lb[view] [source] 2023-11-16 17:07:32
>>mikece+(OP)
The cloud tax is crazy (especially bandwidth). Pretty sure Signal has reached the scale where they would be cheaper by building their infra, maybe starting with the most expensive (storage + bandwidth), and then doing others.

SMS is (unfortunately) core to the product, so I'm not certain how they could make it cheaper, while retaining the same properties (user+pass registration would be a nightmare for spam and change the UX).

◧◩
2. Raston+rf[view] [source] 2023-11-16 17:19:39
>>Aissen+Lb
Anyone know much does it become worth it to build your own? They spend around $3-4m on storage and bandwidth
◧◩◪
3. maxfur+ql[view] [source] 2023-11-16 17:42:00
>>Raston+rf
Data centers cost billions. Signal, and pretty much everyone else who isn't already in the data center business, is far away from breakeven on that.
◧◩◪◨
4. hotnfr+Oz[view] [source] 2023-11-16 18:49:27
>>maxfur+ql
The small ISP/phone/cable company I worked for in high school had a data center. Maybe 20 racks. It was pretty damn reliable (old-school phone infra techs knew how to make shit stay “online”). I guarantee it wasn’t above the single-digit millions to build, inflation adjusted.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. frakki+PJ[view] [source] 2023-11-16 19:34:16
>>hotnfr+Oz
That example of your small telecom company isn't really relevant here, is it? Signal needs to work well for people around the world.
[go to top]