zlacker

>>todsac+(OP)
I tend to consider bullshit any point that finds somehow acceptable thinking that people is lazy, in this society, in this world, on this planet, ffs we have to work 40 hrs per week per decades and rest after reincarnation, and you want to talk about laziness? Let's talk about how any bit of mental energy is extracted to built other's wealth and then when you are too old to do nothing other than watching work in progress they just spit you out

when I am supposed to fix tech debt? if every week there is another functionality going out that needs to be done yesterday? Do you think that I have to do it in my free time? Why should I even bother existing

>>lnxg33+h1
Being not-lazy in your work is not the same as working lots of hours.

>>qup+Y2
> Being not-lazy in your work is not the same as working lots of hours.

You've just provides your personal assertion on a non-definition. Do you actually have an alternative definition that does not imply working lots of hours?

>>rewmie+o4
Isn't it quite obvious that productivity does not scale linearly with time worked? Consistently, I can work 4-6 hours a day at full productivity, and I have to choose less demanding tasks for the other 8-10 waking hours to maximise my productivity and well-being. This is also what I observe in my peers, and while there might be outliers to this, I think the stretch is far less extreme than propagated by some influencers.

>>bakuni+Iy
> Isn't it quite obvious that productivity does not scale linearly with time worked?

Irrelevant, and reads as a non-sequitur. OP expressed his personal assertion on laziness, not productivity.