zlacker

>>dang+it
Cool tech, but plastering "authentic" all over this kind of generated photography is really disingenuous and just rubs me the wrong way. I get that it's informed by real details from other photos, but that's not what authentic means.

If I buy an "authentic Rolex" and receive a Chinese Rolex clone that's built similarly based on observations of a real Rolex, I'm going to feel scammed and very upset. And I'm much more protective of my memories than I would be of a watch.

>>bhaney+Rh
This literally goes against the meaning of the word authenticity.

Call it "realistic". Words matter.

>>flavor+(OP)
[stub for offtopicness]

>>thomas+Tr
"Realistic" is the wrong word, since that's what infill models are already doing, and the word is already used for that. You'd have to find something that differentiates between plausibly realistic and contextual realistic infill.