zlacker

[return to "A journey into the shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma controversy"]
1. kr0bat+2j4[view] [source] 2023-09-26 22:55:12
>>rossan+(OP)

  I came to realize that there was a long-standing scientific controversy in the field, and I felt that I had no choice but to get to the bottom of things myself. Although I am not a medical doctor, I hold a PhD in neuroscience and am familiar with critically reading scientific literature. I decided that I would invest as much time as necessary to learn everything I possibly could on the subject. At that point, there was nothing in my life more important than finding out what had really happened to my son.
This is why higher education (and academic mettle) is amazing
◧◩
2. dartos+vt4[view] [source] 2023-09-26 23:55:18
>>kr0bat+2j4
I think that speaks more towards the author than higher education.

Definitely a tangent, but attributing that attitude to higher education is like someone attributing a doctor saving their life to an act of god. Like yeah if you squint I guess that’s true.

My experience with higher education has been that of administrators taking advantage of my naivety for profit, elitism towards those not in academia, and dismissal of any ideas that wouldn’t directly result in a grant or a good headline.

I wouldn’t really say that the author’s “mettle” is a result of the same environment.

◧◩◪
3. sander+0B4[view] [source] 2023-09-27 00:37:34
>>dartos+vt4
Yeah I dunno... I mean, a lot of these things are true, and they all are big problems, but also, in my experience, academics (at least in the sciences) do actually know how to read and understand research, which is an extremely difficult and useful skill.
◧◩◪◨
4. dartos+DN4[view] [source] 2023-09-27 02:00:27
>>sander+0B4
That’s okay, I know.

Anyone with the wherewithal can learn to “read and understand research” it’s not a magical power bestowed upon the few who receive recognition from some long standing bloated institution.

Attributing the drive and work of an individual to such an institution is weird and elitist.

I should note that if said institution paid for, assembled the team, and provided resources, then that institution obviously deserves credit.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. sander+ff6[view] [source] 2023-09-27 13:31:22
>>dartos+DN4
I think this is a misunderstanding of how stuff works. I agree that anyone (or at least a large percentage of people) can learn to do it and it isn't a magical power.

But it's far more common for academics to be able to do it because that's what academics learn to do. It's a large focus of the training.

It isn't elitist to say "car mechanics are good at reading and acting on the information in car engine manuals", that's just what car mechanics are trained to do and get consistent practice at doing.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. dartos+lr6[view] [source] 2023-09-27 14:28:17
>>sander+ff6
I don’t think there’s any misunderstanding. Your comment seems in line with what I said and what I believe.

One can teach themselves how to be a mechanic and pass the ASE. Most go through some course to learn the trade, of course. It’s more structured that way and many find it easier.

I’ve never had my auto repair shop attribute their mechanic’s skill to where they learned to be a mechanic. I never turned down a mechanic bc they didn’t go to the brown or Harvard of car repair.

On the other hand I’m an expert in my field, but I’ve been turned down from at least 1 job specifically because I didn’t graduate from Brown university. (It was a backend job for the now-defunct Delivery Dudes)

OP attributed the mettle of the author to higher education and academia, which I think is weird and elitist.

Attributing success or ability to an institution fosters that kind of weird elitism.

[go to top]