zlacker

>>c5karl+(OP)
There is a certain sense that Elon Musk paid $44 billion to do this, so he has every right to do so.

>>powera+75
Unless it violates something like the Sherman Act[1]. Obviously we don’t know if they are actually doing this throttling and I don’t know whether it would be considered anticompetitive behaviour under that act but it is an example of where even though he has paid the money he doesn’t have the right to do so.

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherman_Antitrust_Act