zlacker

[return to "How Zoom’s terms of service and practices apply to AI features"]
1. gruez+ch[view] [source] 2023-08-07 18:08:53
>>chrono+(OP)
Called it a few days ago: >>37022827

It's baffling how many people in previous threads thought a company that gets most of its money from enterprise/business clients, will burn all their reputation by surreptitiously using client data to train their AI.

◧◩
2. ec1096+8L[view] [source] 2023-08-07 19:57:52
>>gruez+ch
Always wise to remember Hanlon's razor: "Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence"

Occam's razor also applies here.

◧◩◪
3. functi+tn1[view] [source] 2023-08-07 23:45:31
>>ec1096+8L
I'm done with Hanlon and his Razor. It's useless.

I now use Hanlon's Shaving Brush. Its a broad brush that I use to paint every sketchy move businesses make. "Is it malice? Or is it incompetence that merely looks like malice?". I don't care! I'll assume malice unless otherwise shown.

It's not my job to try and find out how evil shit was done accidentally. It doesn't matter if they "oopsied" into selling a firehose of my data to a "trusted partner" to analyze to death. Nobody actually gives a shit at these companies, so I need to treat them all as if they're malicious. If the underlying cause was a bit of incompetence a few years ago, that does nothing for me when I'm discovering the fuckery.

[go to top]