>>dagurp+(OP)
As usual, a thousand word essay on Google's WEI without ever mentioning that Apple sailed that ship silently a while ago, therefore not attracting any attention or backlash.
>>Zopieu+h52
The post states it. This is not a problem because Safari is not the leading web browser. Apple has very limited power over what they can do with it.
>>bezout+ug2
Exactly. Websites will not require this version because they know that Safari is a minority market share and they can't force users to buy an Apple product. However if this is supported by Chrome and Safari all of a sudden the equation flips and many sites will feel that they can reject service to other users.