zlacker

[return to "Mozilla Standards Positions Opposes Web Integrity API"]
1. eganis+s8[view] [source] 2023-07-25 03:35:49
>>danShu+(OP)
Expected, but meaningless if we can't drive people towards Firefox and away from Chromium products. That's something of a responsibility we all have, especially those of us invested in the safety and security (collectively, trust) of the web.

I haven't seen anything yet on whether Brave will support it, though if I'm understanding correctly, they won't have a choice since they're using Chromium. Hopefully I'm misinformed.

◧◩
2. paulry+N8[view] [source] 2023-07-25 03:40:55
>>eganis+s8
Judging by all the hate Mozilla gets around here, it would be nice to at least see some credit given where it is due.

Ultimately I think we must permanently return to browser ballots back by the law, like the IE bundling fallout. Otherwise friction and incentives will continue to entrench one dominant player.

◧◩◪
3. yjftsj+2k[view] [source] 2023-07-25 05:22:34
>>paulry+N8
Mozilla gets hate because they say they're fighting for the user and then fail to live up to that standard. People expect Google to try and screw over users, so when it happens nobody is disappointed. I do agree that this results in oddly skewed reactions, but the emotional side makes sense.
◧◩◪◨
4. zirak+0q[view] [source] 2023-07-25 06:22:03
>>yjftsj+2k
How do we define "failure"? Let's say we can measure how much Mozilla fights for the user and put it on a scale:

         |--------------------|
    anti-user              pro-user
Where on the scale is "failure"? Let's say Mozilla is on the M, and Google is on the G:

         |----G-------M-------|
    anti-user              pro-user
Is Mozilla failing?

The sentiment I seem to see is that anything short of perfect is failure.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. hypert+Ds[view] [source] 2023-07-25 06:43:18
>>zirak+0q
It's not about the absolute position on the scale, but the direction of change. Mozilla has been moving towards anti-user for years now.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. zirak+sx[view] [source] 2023-07-25 07:28:28
>>hypert+Ds
They went from A to B (exact magnitude of change is of course part of the criticism):

         |------------B---A---|
    anti-user              pro-user
Is Mozilla still, currently, a failure at their job?

---

These kinds of discussions are frustrating to me since it feels like we've been dealt a very bad hand. But it's not just this hand, the dealer is firmly set on us only receiving bad hands in any game we play.

Like in a card game, this is the only hand that we'll get. What other corporation do we have to push these kinds of values? What other avenue do we have? It's sad that we've come to this situation, but if the choice is the currently perceived-to-be-failing Mozilla and no Mozilla, I pick the failing Mozilla.

[go to top]