zlacker

[return to "Twitter Is DDOSing Itself"]
1. lamont+yx[view] [source] 2023-07-01 21:16:01
>>ZacnyL+(OP)
I think we're about at the point where the people who predicted chaos at twitter after Elon basically fired most of the experienced engineers have been proven correct. The duct tape is all coming apart at the seams now.

It isn't quite as decisive as a submarine imploding, and ceasing to exist, but it has turned into a brightly burning tirefire.

◧◩
2. bravoe+Kz[view] [source] 2023-07-01 21:31:06
>>lamont+yx
25 years of products being honed for shareholder value, instead of customer or user value. We may be at peak consumer tolerance for anti-pattern, in-app purchase, subscription-model, ad-packed, data-siphoning, dopamine driven, gated experiences.
◧◩◪
3. Online+zA[view] [source] 2023-07-01 21:35:20
>>bravoe+Kz
> We may be at peak consumer tolerance for anti-pattern, in-app purchase, subscription-model, ad-packed, data-siphoning, dopamine driven, gated experiences.

As much as I want this to be true, I think this sentiment is really only popular on tech-savvy forums like HN. Most people don't use ad blockers, and I've had people get mad at me when I suggest that they do (directly in response to something where they are complaining about ads).

◧◩◪◨
4. tough+LA[view] [source] 2023-07-01 21:36:02
>>Online+zA
> and I've had people get mad at me when I suggest that they do. lol that's a new one, why?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Online+HB[view] [source] 2023-07-01 21:42:40
>>tough+LA
Ultimately it boils down to "it should just work" but to be more specific one person said "I shouldn't have to do anything different!" and directed their anger towards me instead of the ads they were previously complaining about.

People that aren't tech-savvy don't want to think about tech any more than they already do. Having to understand something new about tech is just another problem to them. I'm not saying that as an insult - just an observation.

[go to top]