zlacker

>>AlphaW+(OP)
Kind of funny that despite its users using a DVCS, a huge swath of developers can't VCS because a single point of failure they've opted into.

>>pengar+F9
IMHO, most users of git don't care about the D, they just want a VCS that does network operations faster (CVS and SVN are painful when your server is on the wrong continent) and/or supports a better fork/merge flow.

Centralized VCS makes a lot of sense in a corporate flow, and isn't awful for many projects. I haven't seen a lot of projects that really embrace the distributed nature of git.

>>toast0+Sh
I figure plenty of people wouldn't really mind if you left out the decentralized part specifically, but I assumed a bunch of nice things about git are there because they were basically required for a decent decentralized workflow.