zlacker

>>vforgi+(OP)
Is this just to put up a barrier to entry to new entrants in the market so they can have a government enforced monopoly?

>>simonb+jS
It could be, but it could also be because he is genuinely worried about the future impact of runaway capitalism without guardrails + AI.

>>boston+Wh1
Then the government should takeover OpenAI

>>ipaddr+YB1
Or.. the government could try to apply sensible regulations so that OpenAI and other corporations are less likely to harm society.

>>boston+GC1
Then the government has to spend so much time/money enforcing the rules. When there are few players cutting out the middlemen provides more value

>>ipaddr+qI1
I don't think nationalizing AI corporations is feasible (doubt its legal as well) or in the best interests of the united states. It will handicap development of AI, we will lose our head start, and other countries like China will be able to take the lead.

What value do you see nationalization providing? Generally its done by countries that are having their natural resources extracted by foreign companies and taking all the profits for themselves. Nationalizing lets them take the profits for their country. I'm not sure how it would work for knowledge based companies like OpenAI.