zlacker

[return to "Firefox engineers discover a Windows Defender bug that causes high CPU usage"]
1. mconle+h3[view] [source] 2023-04-05 19:04:46
>>mconle+(OP)
TL;DR: Windows Defender had a bug that made certain system calls expensive on CPU cycles when Defender's Real-time Protection feature is enabled. After discovery, Mozilla reported this issue to Microsoft. Microsoft is releasing a patch that should result in lower CPU usage when using Firefox on sites like YouTube (a ~75% CPU usage reduction was noted when browsing YouTube in Firefox with the fixed version of Defender).

It seems like the HN submission form truncated the # from the end of the URL I linked to, which linked to the relevant comment. I'll try that here:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1441918#c82

and

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1441918#c91

◧◩
2. cjblac+Tl[view] [source] 2023-04-05 20:42:16
>>mconle+h3
I'm curious how much excess energy has been consumed, and won't be consumed any longer, as a result of this improvement - even just limited to reduced CPU usage on Windows machines using Firefox to watch Youtube.

I love thinking about the impacts of tiny improvements at scale like this, might do some napkin math on it later and see if I can come up with something in the right order of magnitude.

◧◩◪
3. 2ICofa+qq[view] [source] 2023-04-05 21:06:27
>>cjblac+Tl
Next: Canadian cars and their daytime running lights.
◧◩◪◨
4. speedg+3E1[view] [source] 2023-04-06 06:54:55
>>2ICofa+qq
Next: internal combustion engines doing more heat than torque.
[go to top]