zlacker

[return to "3dfx: So powerful it’s kind of ridiculous"]
1. ChuckM+25[view] [source] 2023-03-05 05:41:02
>>BirAda+(OP)
My first video accelerator was the Nvidia NV-1 because a friend of mine was on the design team and he assured me that NURBs were going to be the dominant rendering model since you could do a sphere with just 6 of them, whereas triangles needed like 50 and it still looked like crap. But Nvidia was so tight fisted with development details and all their "secret sauce" none of my programs ever worked on it.

Then I bought a 3DFx Voodoo card and started using Glide and it was night and day. I had something up the first day and every day thereafter it seemed to get more and more capable. That was a lot of fun.

In my opinion, Direct X was what killed it most. OpenGL was well supported on the Voodoo cards and Microsoft was determined to kill anyone using OpenGL (which they didn't control) to program games if they could. After about 5 years (Direct X 7 or 8) it had reached feature parity but long before that the "co marketing" dollars Microsoft used to enforce their monopoly had done most of the work.

Sigh.

◧◩
2. useful+t7[view] [source] 2023-03-05 06:19:28
>>ChuckM+25
> Microsoft was determined to kill anyone using OpenGL ... After about 5 years (Direct X 7 or 8) it had reached feature parity but long before that the "co marketing" dollars Microsoft used to enforce their monopoly had done most of the work.

I was acutely aware of the various 3D API issues during this time and this rings very true.

◧◩◪
3. wazoox+Gj[view] [source] 2023-03-05 09:16:51
>>useful+t7
Yup, remember when they "teamed up" with SGI to create "Farenheit"? Embrace, extend, extinguish...
◧◩◪◨
4. pjmlp+Tm[view] [source] 2023-03-05 10:08:38
>>wazoox+Gj
As if SGI didn't had their share in Farenheit's failure.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fahrenheit_(graphics_API)

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. wazoox+UH[view] [source] 2023-03-05 13:52:28
>>pjmlp+Tm
Holy cow I found a nest of Microsoft fans. From your link:

> By 1999 it was clear that Microsoft had no intention of delivering Low Level; although officially working on it, almost no resources were dedicated to actually producing code.

No kidding...

Also the CEO of SGI in the late 90s was an ex-Microsoft and bet heavily on weird technical choices (remember the SGI 320 / 540? I do) that played no small role in sinking the boat. Extremely similar to the infamous Nokia suicide in the 2010s under another Microsoft alumni. I think the similarity isn't due to chance.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. pinewu+OX[view] [source] 2023-03-05 15:44:31
>>wazoox+UH
Don’t attribute to malice that which can be can be attributed to stupidity.

My current employer has fairly recently hired a ton of ex-Google/Microsoft into upper management. They’re universally clueless about our business, spending most of their time trying to shiv one another for power.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. sidlls+Fi2[view] [source] 2023-03-06 00:06:10
>>pinewu+OX
We've recently hired a bunch of ex-Googlers (as well as Twitter-ers and other laid off people). They seem to spend most of their time making sure everyone here knows they're ex-${big_name} and how awesome things were there and we should change everything to do it the same way. It's a bit of a put-off.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. ido+3U2[view] [source] 2023-03-06 06:15:03
>>sidlls+Fi2
Is this not visible to the people with authority to fire them/not hire more such people? Or do they think differently than you?
[go to top]