zlacker

>>isaacf+(OP)
I find it a little odd that Elon seems to take a swipe at OpenAI any opportunity he gets. If he cares so much about them not making money, maybe he should have put his twitter cash there instead? It's reassuring to me that the two people running policy work at the big AI "startups", Jack Clark (Anthropic) and Miles Brundage (OpenAI, who was hired by Jack iirc), are genuinely good humans. I've known Jack for 10 years and he's for sure a measured and reasonable person who cares about not doing harm. Although I don't know Miles, my understanding is he has similar qualities. If they're gonna be for profit, I feel this is really important.

Edit: Well, I guess these tweets explain the beef well -

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1606642155346612229

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1626516035863212034

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1599291104687374338

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1096987465326374912

>>neom+E9
Could you sum up the beefs if it is relevant? I ignore twitter as much as I can.

Part of me feels that in the run to more privacy, we don’t really have a reputation system anymore. You mention that Jack and Miles are good people, but how can we know such things as a general public?

In the days of yore and people were local you kind of new who was who. In the global space, this becomes hard. I feel this ties in with discussions on trust and leaning into people who are responsible and wise.

>>prox+Vb
It's basically exactly as the article. He said he founded open AI (hmmm) with the idea that it's open... ai.. and now it's not, it's closed and for-profit. Re: Jack and Miles, not only is your point well taken, we'd also have to agree that I'm a good judge of character...! :D