zlacker

[return to "Hundreds of changes made to latest editions of Roald Dahl's books"]
1. tptace+aH[view] [source] 2023-02-18 23:08:25
>>GavCo+(OP)
I'd be interested in hearing the most credible/reputable sources speaking out in favor of these changes. I've exclusively seen commentators dunking on this (rightfully so), across the political spectrum. To be clear: I'm wondering if we can find specific people speaking up for this, not an analysis of whose side of the culture war is most culpable for it.
◧◩
2. bla3+Hb1[view] [source] 2023-02-19 03:22:03
>>tptace+aH
I'm neither credible nor reputable, but I'm in favor of a weak version of this. When reading older books to my young child, I replace language that suggests that women are supposed to stay at home and men are supposed to go to work. One day soon he'll be able to read, and at that point I'll wish that books that were a product of their time would have been updated for the current time, so that he could just read the book, without us having to have a conversation about how things were different then.
◧◩◪
3. zmgsab+Zd1[view] [source] 2023-02-19 03:40:57
>>bla3+Hb1
Do you think the best way to address slavery is to erase all the records and pretend it didn’t happen?
◧◩◪◨
4. smt88+gi1[view] [source] 2023-02-19 04:20:43
>>zmgsab+Zd1
Children's books are not a vital record of historical prejudice.

I don't agree with these changes, but this argument makes no sense.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. acuozz+7u1[view] [source] 2023-02-19 06:35:12
>>smt88+gi1
Ask a few random people on the street in a major US city how many books they've read in the past five years.

I'd wager that children's books represent a much larger percentage of the books the typical US citizen reads in their entire lifetime than anyone would like to believe.

If true, this would elevate their importance enough for matters like historical accuracy to be worth considering.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. oblio+hy1[view] [source] 2023-02-19 07:30:59
>>acuozz+7u1
I would imagine past highscool, or the last education level with mandatory book reading, book reading falls off a cliff. And ever for mandatory book reading,I guess about half of students just read some kind of notes instead of the actual book.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. Izkata+uG1[view] [source] 2023-02-19 09:21:13
>>oblio+hy1
I'd put it at middle school. In highschool plenty of students rely on Cliff Notes or whatever the current equivalent is.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. mecha_+ku3[view] [source] 2023-02-19 23:01:18
>>Izkata+uG1
To be fair a lot of students don't bother to read books school assigns as textsx because the way schools run things actually reading, engaging, and thinking about it is a disadvantage. There are certain themes and points your teachers want you to mention in your answers and any analysis outside of that will be considered "incorrect" or given lower marks, even if they relate to the text and the theme being studied.
[go to top]