zlacker

[return to "Hundreds of changes made to latest editions of Roald Dahl's books"]
1. tptace+aH[view] [source] 2023-02-18 23:08:25
>>GavCo+(OP)
I'd be interested in hearing the most credible/reputable sources speaking out in favor of these changes. I've exclusively seen commentators dunking on this (rightfully so), across the political spectrum. To be clear: I'm wondering if we can find specific people speaking up for this, not an analysis of whose side of the culture war is most culpable for it.
◧◩
2. mcguir+aT[view] [source] 2023-02-19 00:41:15
>>tptace+aH
The most cogent analysis I've seen is that the changes were made by the owners of the books in order to sell more books.
◧◩◪
3. joseph+IW[view] [source] 2023-02-19 01:13:07
>>mcguir+aT
From the article:

> The Dahl estate owned the rights to the books until 2021, when Netflix bought them outright for a reported $686 million, building on an earlier rights deal. The American streaming service now has overall control over the book publishing, as well as various adaptation projects that are in the works.

I suspect they're hoping netflix will make movies based on his books. Netflix seems pretty sensitive to twitter opinions. They're probably trying to throw a bone to the twitter mob to make it less likely any new movies get "cancelled".

◧◩◪◨
4. Gigach+M71[view] [source] 2023-02-19 02:43:42
>>joseph+IW
Surely the success of Hogwarts Legacy shows you can just completely ignore twitter and nothing happens.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. joseph+pe1[view] [source] 2023-02-19 03:45:50
>>Gigach+M71
Yeah; I don’t know why it’s taken people so long to realise this. I know it seems to people on Twitter that everyone is on twitter, but that’s really not true. About 10% of people in the USA use Twitter daily - which is a huge number of eyeballs. But that still leaves the remaining 90% of people choosing instead to enjoy our short time on this planet.

If anything, I wouldn’t be surprised if the outrage over Hogwarts Legacy increased sales of the game. I don’t know if I would have heard about it at all if not for the outrage machine.

Louis CK did a show here in Melbourne a few months ago and the show was sold out. For better or worse, being canceled doesn’t seem like a life sentence.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. jquery+1f1[view] [source] 2023-02-19 03:52:01
>>joseph+pe1
Because being cancelled isn't a real thing. It's usually just scoundrels angry they received the slightest bit of pushback. Dave Chapelle constantly whines that queer people are trying to cancel him while he cashes $20m Netflix checks on a regular basis.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. joseph+0i1[view] [source] 2023-02-19 04:19:19
>>jquery+1f1
Being cancelled is very much a real thing, since a lot of people have, e.g., spineless bosses who will immediately capitulate to the Twitter mob's demands.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. joseph+2l1[view] [source] 2023-02-19 04:47:50
>>joseph+0i1
Yep; to say nothing of the psychological effects of being told that the whole world hates you. That sounds really traumatic.

I'm not generally a contrapoints fan, but I really enjoyed the video she made about her experience with this on twitter:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OjMPJVmXxV8

Or the TED talk "How one tweet can ruin your life" from 2015:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAIP6fI0NAI

We studied To Kill a Mockingbird and The Crucible when I was in highschool. I remember thinking how barbaric and despicable "mob justice" was. I didn't understand it, and I assumed I never would - I thought it was something we reference from history. But twitter really has brought the mob justice style witch hunts back.

I don't understand how anyone can claim its not a real phenomenon. Being cancelled is obviously quite a real experience for the people it happens to.

[go to top]