zlacker

[return to "Hundreds of changes made to latest editions of Roald Dahl's books"]
1. bko+h5[view] [source] 2023-02-18 18:42:51
>>GavCo+(OP)
Here's a good list of changes. Most are about removing any references to ugly or fat. But also other strange things like changing the author's Matilda likes to read to include Jane Austin and John Steinbeck, not calling people crazy, swapping screeching to annoying, removing brothers and sisters to favor "siblings" and using "folks" instead of "ladies and gentlemen"

https://twitter.com/incunabula/status/1626860237104857089

◧◩
2. bitwiz+IM[view] [source] 2023-02-18 23:50:36
>>bko+h5
Joseph Conrad and Rudyard Kipling wrote favorably about colonialism; they were replaced with more agreeable authors.

Use of gendered language is marginalizing to nonbinary people.

It's easy to figure out why these changes are being made in particular, once you take a position of empathy.

◧◩◪
3. ilyt+zP[view] [source] 2023-02-19 00:12:10
>>bitwiz+IM
Your triggers are your responsibility; you can just not read author instead of pushing for and celebrating desecration of their work.

> once you take a position of empathy.

...and the usual thinly veiled "if you don't agree with my opinion you're a Bad Person". How about taking position of sensibility for once ?

◧◩◪◨
4. heavys+XP[view] [source] 2023-02-19 00:15:23
>>ilyt+zP
> Your triggers are your responsibility; you can just not read author instead of pushing for and celebrating desecration of their work.

The same argument can be made about people who are triggered by this edition of the book. You can just not read the new edition instead of pushing for and celebrating the silencing of its owners.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. ilyt+pQ[view] [source] 2023-02-19 00:19:15
>>heavys+XP
Sure, disclose it is the edited version for "sensitive readers offended by writing of the time" of minority group on the cover and I'm all fine with it.

But it won't happen because that would be honesty and we can't have that from people that push for the changes

[go to top]