zlacker

[return to "Twitter applies 7-day suspension to half a dozen journalists"]
1. afavou+n6[view] [source] 2022-12-16 02:16:28
>>prawn+(OP)
So this is how Twitter goes out: not with a bang but with a seemingly endless stream of stories about the little ways Elon is ruining the service each day.

Just staggers me that Elon could have just… not done any of this. And yet here we are. He’s had to sell billions in Tesla stock to finance this ongoing mayhem, this is surely going to be up there as one of the greatest examples of hubris in modern business.

◧◩
2. letter+Zc[view] [source] 2022-12-16 02:53:08
>>afavou+n6
> So this is how Twitter goes out: not with a bang but with a seemingly endless stream of stories about the little ways Elon is ruining the service each day.

He also brought back a ton of banned people … who were similarly banned without explanation.

In this case, he needs to set rules and judges for his kingdom if he wants a certain group to keep using it.

As an aside, one of the people banned was known to take clips out of context. Add commentary on top, and actively mislead people. Imo these aren’t journalists, they’re activists

◧◩◪
3. ceejay+im[view] [source] 2022-12-16 03:41:20
>>letter+Zc
> As an aside, one of the people banned was known to take clips out of context. Add commentary on top, and actively mislead people. Imo these aren’t journalists, they’re activists

All of these things - mischaracterization, commentary, misinformation, activism - fall well within the "free speech" Musk said he'd be protecting, even if your assertions are true.

◧◩◪◨
4. letter+VP[view] [source] 2022-12-16 07:09:00
>>ceejay+im
Certainly, I don’t think banning anyone is okay.

Musk isn’t actually doing anything but applying the already existing anti-doxing rules.

Project Veritas (also a “journalists”) was banned for over a year for accidentally having an address in one of their videos.

I think both cases are ridiculous, but the same journalists who were recently banned cheered veritas being banned.

No banning, anyone, for any reasons, besides direct threats - aka first amendment (I would argue real-time tracking is probably a threat, but idk)

[go to top]