zlacker

>>davidg+(OP)
I’ve noticed that people tend to disapprove of AI trained on their profession’s data, but are usually indifferent or positive about other applications of AI.

For example, I know artists who are vehemently against DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, etc. and regard it as stealing, but they view Copilot and GPT-3 as merely useful tools. I also know software devs who are extremely excited about AI art and GPT-3 but are outraged by Copilot.

For myself, I am skeptical of intellectual property in the first place. I say go for it.

>>kweing+v6
I am strongly against intellectual property, but I don’t like this idea that any one of us will get in big trouble for openly violating IP restrictions, but if one of these big companies scoops up copyrighted works for their AI it’s fine? The double standard is unfair. This all seems like a great opportunity for big companies to encourage the growth of Creative Commons, which would benefit everyone, but instead they’re making large private datasets only they control.