>>rat998+94
Then it's probably not the place for you, or people with thin skin that don't want to deal with that kind of tone/communication. If they lose out on talent because of it, that's their loss. Not every project has to be perfect and all-inclusive to the entire world of developers, and I'm okay with that.
>>zo1+g8
It’s crazy to think that advocating for reasonable, non-toxic people to work with receives this kind response.
Inclusivity and non-hostile work environments should not be considered “perfect” and “all-inclusive”. They should be basic. The default. The lowest bar possible.
>>myname+Y8
So an "inclusive" and "non-toxic work environment" should put fantasy above reality? There's nothing inherently toxic in Linus' message; he's making a technical point about how kernel code should be designed, to deal effectively with the sometimes complex and challenging reality of low-level systems.
>>nickm1+Do5
He's doing no such thing. He's saying "surely you're well past kindergarten and don't believe in Santa Claus, so why would you ever believe this?" It's a valid argument.