zlacker

>>rvz+(OP)
I am the only one who would have a hard time to collaborate on a project where the "collaborators" start their message with

> You need to realize that

> (a) reality trumps fantasy

?

>>rat998+94
Then it's probably not the place for you, or people with thin skin that don't want to deal with that kind of tone/communication. If they lose out on talent because of it, that's their loss. Not every project has to be perfect and all-inclusive to the entire world of developers, and I'm okay with that.

>>zo1+g8
It’s crazy to think that advocating for reasonable, non-toxic people to work with receives this kind response.

Inclusivity and non-hostile work environments should not be considered “perfect” and “all-inclusive”. They should be basic. The default. The lowest bar possible.

>>myname+Y8
You're correct, it should be the default.

But why are you complaining that a group of people who don't want to work in your default environment went off and created their own?

I don't understand what you have to complain about: they have their way of working and you want to change that because it offends you?

Sounds like you're the problem, not them.

>>lelant+r51
Sounds like he's calling them out on an internet forum that they are also free to ignore. Doesn't sound like he's the problem.

>>V_Terr+J61
> Sounds like he's calling them out on an internet forum that they are also free to ignore. Doesn't sound like he's the problem.

Well, I don't go around pointing out how random groups, formed by like-minded people voluntarily, are doing collaboration "wrong".

If I did, on some random internet forum, complain that the local Street Rod Enthusiasts Club[1] doesn't do proper agendas for their meetings, or that a book-reading club[1] that I know off isn't properly structured, or that the volunteer SPCA group is using the wrong IM/Chat software to communicate .. well, then I'm the problem.

[1] That I have no intention of joining