zlacker

[return to "“Rust is safe” is not some kind of absolute guarantee of code safety"]
1. rat998+94[view] [source] 2022-10-02 14:50:36
>>rvz+(OP)
I am the only one who would have a hard time to collaborate on a project where the "collaborators" start their message with

> You need to realize that

> (a) reality trumps fantasy

?

◧◩
2. zo1+g8[view] [source] 2022-10-02 15:13:21
>>rat998+94
Then it's probably not the place for you, or people with thin skin that don't want to deal with that kind of tone/communication. If they lose out on talent because of it, that's their loss. Not every project has to be perfect and all-inclusive to the entire world of developers, and I'm okay with that.
◧◩◪
3. myname+Y8[view] [source] 2022-10-02 15:18:02
>>zo1+g8
It’s crazy to think that advocating for reasonable, non-toxic people to work with receives this kind response.

Inclusivity and non-hostile work environments should not be considered “perfect” and “all-inclusive”. They should be basic. The default. The lowest bar possible.

◧◩◪◨
4. ectopo+Tc[view] [source] 2022-10-02 15:40:35
>>myname+Y8
Which is worse?

a) Having poor communication skills.

b) Describing people as toxic.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. myname+Id[view] [source] 2022-10-02 15:45:34
>>ectopo+Tc
If the shoe fits.

Do you have any actual counter points or were you planning on beating that ad hominem to death?

[go to top]