zlacker

[return to "“Rust is safe” is not some kind of absolute guarantee of code safety"]
1. rat998+94[view] [source] 2022-10-02 14:50:36
>>rvz+(OP)
I am the only one who would have a hard time to collaborate on a project where the "collaborators" start their message with

> You need to realize that

> (a) reality trumps fantasy

?

◧◩
2. myname+I6[view] [source] 2022-10-02 15:06:09
>>rat998+94
This is also the “toned down” version of Linus.

If he were any other person, he’d have been axed a long time ago for this behavior.

I don’t understand how people put up with this kind of toxicity, even from him.

◧◩◪
3. bluefl+fd[view] [source] 2022-10-02 15:43:19
>>myname+I6
I bear this because in my opinion, software development has insufficient regulation and standards. I've seen enough bad software that im glad that someone is enforcing some standards regarding worst-case behavior, because this is something that is neglected too often.

Its a bit sad that Linus needs to replicate individually what other engineering disciplines are mandated to by regulations. Look at car, train or aviation safety, they are decades ahead.

[go to top]