zlacker

>>tonyst+(OP)
No it does not. Give it to me for 5’ and I will find at least 10 things that are broken. Energy management, monitor color profiles, external monitors, discrete gpu / integrated switching, Bluetooth, webcam settings all these are broken.

Stop defending the state of Linux in personal computing.

The best we can do is to put it in a VM and run it in a OS that has actual hardware support.

>>whatev+a5
Can you name a kernel with more robust hardware support?

>>smolde+g6
Windows for starters. Also the title claims that things work well not that linux is the best.

>>CyberD+x7
Windows has pretty terrible hardware support IMO. Comparing the state of Linux Vs Windows on ARM/PowerPC/RISC-V, it's not even a contest.

I think there's a case to be made for the stability of Windows drivers (I should hope vendors don't half-ass support), but modern networking and storage drivers on Linux blow Microsoft's analogs out of the water.

>>smolde+V8
> PowerPC/RISC-V

The person you replied to didn't mention those and there aren't laptops with those CPUs anyway, so this is just goal post shifting nonsense.

> but modern networking and storage drivers on Linux blow Microsoft's analogs out of the water

I don't think that's true at all and you didn't link any evidence.