zlacker

>>akolbe+(OP)
Sure but pointing out $350k executive salaries as somehow lavish is strange. That seems low for an executive at one of the most important (or at least, most viewed) websites on the planet.

>>yupper+5b
$350k salaries _are_ lavish, though. It seems strange to me that people would argue otherwise.

>>JohnFe+Uf
In a sense they are, but comparable to executive salaries at companies with roughly comparable tech/services, those salaries are probably very low.

Probably any tech company of note is paying "executives" far, far more than that, at least in the US.

>>Tulliu+Jk
I don't think it's valid to think extravagant pay rates are not extravagant simply because other executives are also paid extravagant rates.

They are all a bit over-the-top.

>>JohnFe+rw
Extravagant is a subjective term and for pay it's relative to the location, position, experience, etc.