zlacker

[return to "Queen Elizabeth II has died"]
1. 2pEXgD+X31[view] [source] 2022-09-08 22:33:32
>>xd+(OP)
I gotta admit that it is a bit weird to see british royalty being so heavily privileged that they even get special moderation treatment here on HN to protect them (?) from any negativity, or rather stop negativity about them.

I'm not keen on the idea of using this submission to flame the Queen, I obviously agree with the general rule of avoiding flamebait, what I mean is that other HN submissions on the deaths of people certainly didn't get this special treatment. It is also not at all enforced in both directions when looking at the obviously and comically over the top positive comments of low quality which contain no real substance.

Edit: I used the wording "stop negativity" which might be misleading, since (as far as I am aware) no comments are being deleted. What I'm talking about is moderation giving out a lot of warnings and keeping a closer watch on "flamebait" violations than I've ever seen before on any submission.

◧◩
2. 93po+U91[view] [source] 2022-09-08 23:11:15
>>2pEXgD+X31
I love hating on moderation and I'm always ready to be critical of it, and of dang, if it's warranted. But I will say "monarchy is bad" comments are boring and don't lead to interesting discussion. There's a million other places to express that if you want.
◧◩◪
3. encryp+Do1[view] [source] 2022-09-09 01:24:48
>>93po+U91
But hundreds of comments repeating the most boring things like "she will be missed" aren't better left for the I Love Being Ruled Over Facebook Group?
◧◩◪◨
4. dang+E02[view] [source] 2022-09-09 07:56:49
>>encryp+Do1
(That's pretty funny.)

This is the point I was trying to make at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32769925 by quoting pg's 15-year-old bit about how empty positive comments aren't so bad (https://news.ycombinator.com/newswelcome.html). It's true that they don't contain any more information than empty negative comments, but they don't degrade the threads the way empty negative comments do.

Unfortunately people took that as some sort of pro-monarchist stance!

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. teddyh+Ie2[view] [source] 2022-09-09 10:10:57
>>dang+E02
All advocates of temperance and moderation are preservers of the status quo. Therefore advocates of change naturally fall afoul of the moderators.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. tptace+Il3[view] [source] 2022-09-09 16:52:27
>>teddyh+Ie2
They certainly do when their advocacy takes the form of sneering.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. teddyh+br4[view] [source] 2022-09-09 22:58:12
>>tptace+Il3
Tone policing is a form of moderation.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. tptace+Us4[view] [source] 2022-09-09 23:12:45
>>teddyh+br4
Yes, of course it is.
[go to top]