zlacker

[return to "Kiwi Farms has been removed from the Internet Archive"]
1. peanut+Ky1[view] [source] 2022-09-07 11:44:05
>>danso+(OP)
I guess the internet archive doesn’t take their mission of preserving the internet very seriously
◧◩
2. margin+WI1[view] [source] 2022-09-07 12:59:17
>>peanut+Ky1
If anything, the reason there's such a controversy in the first place is that they've gotten far more attention than they wanted. This sort of activity is only possible while skulking in obscurity.

Damnatio memoriae is devastating to a public figure, but it is doing KiwiFarms a huge favor. It lets them scurry away under some new rock and keep going under a new name. The worst thing you could do is probably just shine the brightest spotlight you can find square at their activities.

There is a good reason we erect monuments and museums to atrocities. It's not for ease of rubbernecking, but so that we can learn and avoid them in the future.

◧◩◪
3. pclmul+WJ1[view] [source] 2022-09-07 13:05:24
>>margin+WI1
This whole campaign has been damning for the folks trying to take down kiwifarms. All of the evidence of their bad past behavior that used to be confined to one obscure site is now plastered all over the internet, and millions of people know about it.

My personal semi-conspiracy theory on this is that the search warrant served on Keffals (no, not a SWAT call, a search warrant) contained some note that they got probable cause from evidence on a kiwifarms thread. Since then, Keffals has been running to countries with no extradition treaties to Canada and trying their hardest to erase that evidence from the internet under the guise of stopping suicides.

◧◩◪◨
4. antite+MN1[view] [source] 2022-09-07 13:26:24
>>pclmul+WJ1
This doesn’t really hold up to logic, at least as written.

If the note references probable cause from a thread and the evidence is on kf, wouldn’t the authorities already have that evidence or be able to get a search warrant for it? Why would they search someone’s house for it?

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. pclmul+bU1[view] [source] 2022-09-07 13:53:11
>>antite+MN1
Probable cause is not enough evidence to convict someone, but enough to conduct a further search to see if there is enough evidence for a conviction. See here (although this is US-focused, many other states have similar ideas): https://www.findlaw.com/criminal/criminal-rights/probable-ca...

Basically, they had the allegations and enough substantiating evidence to go to the point of looking for more evidence, but not to get all the way to an arrest/conviction. A search warrant is the next step.

EDIT: Also, the police have most likely downloaded the information, but you never know.

[go to top]