zlacker

[return to "U.S. public health agencies aren't ‘following the science,’ officials say"]
1. theand+q3[view] [source] 2022-07-14 18:31:46
>>themgt+(OP)
> One CDC scientist told us about her shame and frustration about what happened to American children during the pandemic: “CDC failed to balance the risks of Covid with other risks that come from closing schools,” she said. “Learning loss, mental health exacerbations were obvious early on and those worsened as the guidance insisted on keeping schools virtual. CDC guidance worsened racial equity for generations to come. It failed this generation of children.”
◧◩
2. mc32+wR[view] [source] 2022-07-15 00:05:07
>>theand+q3
The worst part of the pandemic beside policies that would swing back and forth (which is kind of understandable if you're learning as you go) was the inability to have discussions about the pros and cons of shutdowns and other pandemic related policies.

Social media and mainstream media saw it fit to censor dissenting voices --not those of quacks, we can mostly all agree on minimizing the voices of quacks but shutting down medical professionals and medical academics and so on is very concerning.

The only people they allowed to be wrong about the pandemic were govt officials. They could get it wrong and right it as many times as necessary.

◧◩◪
3. s3r3ni+IU[view] [source] 2022-07-15 00:30:33
>>mc32+wR
> Social media and mainstream media saw it fit to censor dissenting voices --not those of quacks, we can mostly all agree on minimizing the voices of quacks but shutting down medical professionals and medical academics and so on is very concerning.

No I don't agree with censoring _any_ voices - precisely because of this issue. The decentralized market of ideas will address the "quacks" in the room, as I don't trust any central authority to do that for me.

If a centralized authority wields power in a way that creates negative consequences, you don't give them _more_ power, or just hope that they'll do the right thing.

◧◩◪◨
4. majorm+qV[view] [source] 2022-07-15 00:37:36
>>s3r3ni+IU
> The decentralized market of ideas will address the "quacks" in the room, as I don't trust any central authority to do that for me.

It'll magically take care of itself? Based on what evidence?

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. s3r3ni+jX[view] [source] 2022-07-15 00:51:08
>>majorm+qV
Based on all of recorded history.

For example, we didn't need the Vatican, a king, or some other central committee to tell us that the sun was the center of our solar system - eventually the data and market of ideas exposed the best & correct ideas.

The best disinfectant for bad ideas is more sunlight - not coverups.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. wonder+E21[view] [source] 2022-07-15 01:29:23
>>s3r3ni+jX
Sure, that took hundreds of years, we really don't have that sort of time during a pandemic.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. theand+z41[view] [source] 2022-07-15 01:50:16
>>wonder+E21
So? When time is short, nobody knows which ideas are right.
[go to top]