Why? My experience with them was pretty bad. I took their assessment for web development, I think I even did an assignment, and got put on a video call with someone from Triplebyte. He never cracked a smile. Suddenly I got asked a bunch of CS questions that really were not very relevant to web development, some of which were entirely inappropriate like sorting a binary search tree. I even told the guy that I thought I was getting those questions wrong and he just scowled and said "well you just don't know when you're going to use this stuff." "My point exactly," I thought.
Ultimately I got rejected.
The whole idea that you can boil down a candidate to some coding challenges and a video quiz is bad. I do like the idea of streamlining the hiring process for developers, but there's more to it than knowing a bunch of stuff, because that can be gamed. And quizzing me on irrelevant material was a bad move. A firm like Triplebyte won't be as good at interviewing a candidate as the employer itself, and may even keep perfectly qualified candidates out of view from all employers affiliated with them.
So it helped me in introducing me to companies I wasn't previously familiar with, but other job platforms work in similar manner.
I get the impression that Triplebyte has changed from what it used to be. I never even talked with anyone at Triplebyte. I did well enough on some skill test that I was put on a fast track and quickly approved without any interviews. I also got opportunities to take other tests to rate my skills in particular areas.
It seemed like a decent place for presenting possible candidates to employers with some pre-screening, but it wasn't anything particularly innovative. I imagine that as an employer, it helps filter out a lot of unskilled candidates with pretty resumes and reduces the number of interviews required.