zlacker

>>tagoll+(OP)
I get the point he's making. But still, if he didn't like the lack of nuance why not find somewhere to work other than Microsoft?

>>jancsi+Os
What a great example of his point.

You just picked a single item and acted as though it were the only consideration in the universe.

Did be anywhere say that this interesting phenomenon he observed was the worst thing in the world and made MS intolerable? Did he anywhere say that this was a uniquely MS problem?

This article was about dynamics of one-to-many communication with humans, not about why MS sucks.

>>Brian_+wu
>> I get the point he's making. But still, if he didn't like the lack of nuance why not find somewhere to work other than Microsoft?

> You just picked a single item and acted as though it were the only consideration in the universe. Did he anywhere say that this interesting phenomenon he observed was the worst thing in the world and made MS intolerable? Did he anywhere say that this was a uniquely MS problem?

This also seems like a great example.