>>jahnu+(OP)
I don't fully understand how archive.is operates. They don't remove copyrighted content (which I like, since it provides a useful service), they must have probably terabytes upon terabytes of data in some datacenter somewhere, yet they never seem to be shut down by the govt or their datacenter/cloud provider. Am I just naive to be surprised by this? How does all this work exactly?
>>voldac+yl
I'm almost certain the actual reason is producing all the infrastructure to DMCA content on Google/Facebook/Twitter/Youtube and other "mainstream" Web 2.0 platforms is expensive.
Copyright enforcement is a lot stricter on Youtube, than say, Reddit video.
It's all down to the engagement of the IP owners.
My guess is they just haven't gotten around to chasing Archive.is down that hard.
>>urthor+GB
It’s a value proposition. Archive.is doesn’t host Hollywood blockbusters. If it is hard to take them down, nobody is going to do that as long as they don’t cause to much real damage.