This is what I mean by 'underdeveloped':
- Most software dev job postings (as of May 2018) have SPECIFIC tech stack requirements. This to me is a red flag. Most recruiters in 'developed' tech cities assume that software development skills are transferable and that technology stacks/frameworks/languages can be learned.
- The salaries offered were still very low compared to comparable COL locations like Austin
- No major FAANG presence to put upward pressure on local developer wages
I lived and worked there for a while there.
* Most of the tech jobs are out in burbs like alpharetta ect.
* City is just not great. There isn't much to do.
* Feels a bit old school and traditional.
* No access to snow for skiing , to the ocean for surfing, mountain biking trails are decent but not great.
* Music scene is not good. I don't like to listen to country , rock ect.
* I always feel a little scared to drive outside ATL into GA, Alabama. Confederate flags, churches in the gas stations. I've heard some stories from my friends. I admit that this might be an irrational fear.
If you want to ski, fly to Colorado and ski...if you want to be a ski bum, yes...Atlanta is not for you.
And yes, it has its downsides...it is sprawling, public transportation is not good, it can get very hot in the summer, crime can be high, and generally many of the problems that large metro areas deal with.
I have to disagree, after living in West Midtown Atlanta for the past 3 years. There's one large park (Piedmont) downtown, but beyond that I have to drive 30mins-1hour for any park of comparable size.
If you drive 30-60 minutes you get to dozens of bike and hiking trails in big parks.
Not to mention all the trees everywhere and pocket parks.
The parks aren’t necessarily the best in the world or anything, but there’s lots of space and more than most major cities. One thing is that the parks aren’t built up around very much like other cities.