zlacker

[return to "The Lonely Work of Moderating Hacker News (2019)"]
1. echelo+ce[view] [source] 2020-11-10 18:29:30
>>bluu00+(OP)
Thanks dang!

You've helped keep HN readable, corrected countless title and link errors, and prevented heated discussions from devolving into fights.

I also am super thankful for your help getting my "Show HN" post to the front page.

We all appreciate you.

◧◩
2. crispy+c61[view] [source] 2020-11-10 22:03:53
>>echelo+ce
What help is available to get show hn posts to the front page?
◧◩◪
3. foota+G71[view] [source] 2020-11-10 22:11:48
>>crispy+c61
Following their post history, it looks like https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11662380.
◧◩◪◨
4. TeMPOr+m72[view] [source] 2020-11-11 08:30:07
>>foota+G71
Thanks for linking that. TIL: sorting rank is a function of timestamp and votes, so when the mods push a story back to the front page, instead of special-casing the behavior, they just (get a computer to) fabricate a submission timestamp that puts the story in appropriate place on the front page.

It's a clever hack, alright, but dang if I didn't start to think I was going crazy, because something felt off with timestamps and surely the mods wouldn't be silently messing with those...

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. dang+Vq3[view] [source] 2020-11-11 19:02:28
>>TeMPOr+m72
It's not a great solution because it confuses the people who notice. The problem is that it's even more confusing if we re-up posts that say "3 days ago" or whatever onto the front page. Then the threads fill up with "why is this 3 days ago post on the front page"?

Another option would be to clone the old submission into a new one, but then we get more dupes. And I don't know of any viable fourth option.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. TeMPOr+q55[view] [source] 2020-11-12 09:13:58
>>dang+Vq3
Maybe display the old timestamp, but also display a visible "re-up" tag next to it? This way it'll be obvious the submission was reinserted manually to give it a second chance.
[go to top]