zlacker

[return to "Police act like laws don't apply to them because of Qualified Immunity"]
1. remote+u5[view] [source] 2020-05-31 22:52:45
>>lpolov+(OP)
They need to double the pay for cops and remove their protections like qualified immunity and the right to fire if they feel threatened. This is the only way we get higher quality cops in the system, we incentivize better people to join with money. Maybe once we have a critical mass of great cops we will need less cops overall.

All of these extra costs associated with overtime etc because of these riots and looting are a direct result of employing shitty cops and completely avoidable. The costs should be taken directly from the pension funds of cops as far as I’m concerned, cities should not bear the costs of overtime because of riots caused by cops killing people.

If we had a critical mass of good cops, we likely would need less overtime overall because the relationship would be better between law enforcement and citizens, especially minorities.

◧◩
2. greedo+78[view] [source] 2020-05-31 23:10:25
>>remote+u5
My neighbor is a Sargent in the local PD. Town of 300K. He made $140K last year ($40K of it OT). I think the notion that police are underpaid is not accurate, at least here.
◧◩◪
3. remote+za[view] [source] 2020-05-31 23:28:19
>>greedo+78
My point is we should pay cops very high salaries, $300k+ to attract those that might go into other professions.
◧◩◪◨
4. corrys+Xa[view] [source] 2020-05-31 23:31:17
>>remote+za
You seem to equate high salary with compassion. What is this notion based on?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. jadell+Sd[view] [source] 2020-05-31 23:55:11
>>corrys+Xa
It's less about compassion and more about risk. Risk in the sense of the physical danger an officer goes into, but also in the sense that we are removing protections for the officer and holding them to a higher standard.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Camero+Wn[view] [source] 2020-06-01 01:46:07
>>jadell+Sd
The most common cause of death for police officers is traffic fatalities. Should we pay highway construction crews 300K+?
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. ulises+jG[view] [source] 2020-06-01 06:53:11
>>Camero+Wn
That’s a terrible analogy. Obviously they’re more at risk of dying a violent death and that’s why they need to pay more
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. giardi+j12[view] [source] 2020-06-01 17:25:43
>>ulises+jG
Not really: they're safer at work than you are at home. Police work is very safe in the USA. But it can be very unpleasant and stressful.

The idea that policing is inherently dangerous is most useful to police when negotiating the next contract.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. ulises+2w6[view] [source] 2020-06-03 00:44:12
>>giardi+j12
That is absolutely not true and I don’t know why you think that, other than you’re super sheltered. You have no clue what you’re talking about

Tell me why the Mexican Mafia has no teeth. Enlighten me. Tell me why the Aryan Brotherhood is less dangerous than Kubernetes

It’s not ever worth discussing with y’all, seriously. The privilege here is so insane, you’ve obviously never been anywhere near a ghetto

[go to top]