zlacker

[return to "The business of tear gas"]
1. splitr+f5[view] [source] 2020-06-02 15:25:02
>>hhs+(OP)
Tear gas is a chemical weapon and as such is banned in war according to the Geneva Conventions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/08/1...

◧◩
2. oicu81+A5[view] [source] 2020-06-02 15:27:03
>>splitr+f5
The article states, "It also lives in a legal gray zone, due to international treaties that allow it to be used in domestic law enforcement but not in war."
◧◩◪
3. geogra+S5[view] [source] 2020-06-02 15:28:07
>>oicu81+A5
Right - that seems horribly wrong. It shouldn't be allowed for law enforcement either.
◧◩◪◨
4. monocl+p6[view] [source] 2020-06-02 15:29:58
>>geogra+S5
Do you have a better solution? Perhaps you should bring it to market.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. ohlook+Va[view] [source] 2020-06-02 15:49:34
>>monocl+p6
There are so many countries around the world that do fine without the violence, brutality and military gear the US forces use. I could not imagine images like the ones I see now in the US in countries like Germany, Denmark, Austria, Sweden, … All use better tactics and seem to be able to handle even large crowds without shooting and explosives. They normally try to DE-escalate (unlike in the US).

But if I read the basic police training in the US is 6 month or less and even hair cutters need more training, this ship seems to have sailed until better training is in place. I am really shocked about what is going on in the US.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Improb+0p[view] [source] 2020-06-02 16:58:11
>>ohlook+Va
I can only speak for Germany, but tear gas usage during protests/riots is pretty common. Don't think rubber bullets get used though.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. LargoL+Og1[view] [source] 2020-06-02 21:30:58
>>Improb+0p
Speaking of Germany...

WARNING GRAPHIC NSFW https://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article10267909/Demo...

Context: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dietrich_Wagner

[go to top]