zlacker

[return to "White nationalist group posing as antifa called for violence on Twitter"]
1. bruceb+K5[view] [source] 2020-06-02 03:11:16
>>aspenm+(OP)
Blaming the boogy man of White Nationalists, Russia, or outside outside agitators is a way to shift blame by politicians and an easy scapegoat. Amusingly the governor of Minnesota, and a big city MN mayor blamed vandalism & lootingrioters as being the work of people who were all from out of state, thereby parroting Trump's same line (or he theirs).

They (not Trump of course) had to walk it back when it turned out not to be true.

Is there some outside groups posing as others, possibly, but to blame a majority of problems on them is just BS.

◧◩
2. epakai+ho[view] [source] 2020-06-02 06:19:02
>>bruceb+K5
The problem is antifa has become the new boogy man for the GOP, and they've been pushing this narrative extremely hard. It's apparent they've identified their enemy, but this approach has me worried that "First they came for the antifa..." might not be far off.

I see a lot of mischaracterization of what is a category, not a group. From what I can tell antifa is anti-fascism, and somewhat characterized by people willing to take direct action.

◧◩◪
3. croon+rp[view] [source] 2020-06-02 06:29:31
>>epakai+ho
They've already tried to paint BLM as a violent organization, so no new low surprises me.
◧◩◪◨
4. humanr+2x[view] [source] 2020-06-02 07:47:24
>>croon+rp
Who do you attribute the assassinations of police officers to? I guess you could argue that they weren't "organized", but it seems about as organized as right-wing terrorism like the shooting in Charleston (a.k.a. the fascism the anti-fascism is counteracting).
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. croon+wy[view] [source] 2020-06-02 08:00:59
>>humanr+2x
I don't consider Christianity a violent organization despite the crusades and the inquisition, nor do I consider Islam a violent organization, or most other religions.

I consider an organization on their tenets, under which Black Lives Matter is completely fine.

KKK for example isn't.

Right-wing terrorism has no redeeming kernel of decency, nor does it have a productive movement behind the (few?) bad actors.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. a13692+Tz[view] [source] 2020-06-02 08:15:39
>>croon+wy
> I consider an organization on their tenets

No, you don't, or you would consider a religion that endorses literally infinite amounts of torture for anyone who disagrees with them to be violent. There's also its attitudes toward homosexuality (Leviticus 18:22), slavery (Exodus 21:7), murdering people for working on saturdays (or maybe sundays?) (Exodus 35:2), and touching pig remains (Leviticus 11:7), among others.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. colejo+4X[view] [source] 2020-06-02 12:34:15
>>a13692+Tz
You’re quoting the Old Testament. The “lesser laws” of which were superseded by the “higher law” instituted by Jesus.
[go to top]