zlacker

[return to "De-Escalation Keeps Protesters and Police Safer"]
1. davros+Y8[view] [source] 2020-06-02 01:39:05
>>oftenw+(OP)
From afar, it seems to me like the big problem in US policing is a lack of calm professionalism. The de-escalation approach in the article would to me but just one aspect of taking a professional approach where safety and following rules and best practices is paramount (and prioritised over 'winning' against criminals).
◧◩
2. rectan+Ra[view] [source] 2020-06-02 01:54:32
>>davros+Y8
I have always suspected that US police are shunted into sub-optimal patterns because there are so many guns here that the odds a simple interaction will involve a firearm are much higher than they are in less-well-armed societies. Does anybody know if I'm right about that?

That doesn't mean that they can't do more de-escalation or take other steps, but the high prevalence of guns does seem like it would be a contributing factor.

(I realize this touches a hot topic (guns) but it's an honest question, and sympathetic to law enforcement.)

◧◩◪
3. bluedi+1h[view] [source] 2020-06-02 02:46:55
>>rectan+Ra
There have been almost no guns used against police during these protests.
◧◩◪◨
4. humanr+bJ[view] [source] 2020-06-02 07:21:58
>>bluedi+1h
But to rephrase, there was a LEO murdered in a drive-by shooting.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. bobbea+971[view] [source] 2020-06-02 11:52:43
>>humanr+bJ
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Floyd_protests 200 cities have had protests. Out of the probably hundreds of thousands of people protesting, guns have been responsible for one death of an officer (as far as I know)
[go to top]