zlacker

>>minima+(OP)
All I wanted to do was read the memo and I couldn't find the link. I'm not sure if I missed it or what but this is a common problem I run into on "news" sites. They quote (often out of context) parts of something but give no links to the actual source.

>>chowar+M6
Probably because it was forwarded by email and the leaker's identity and job would be at risk.

>>anigbr+Hf
Redacting is a long accepted practice when revealing information but preserving secrets.

>>daenz+Th
Supposedly so is the practice of using subtle variations in spelling, word choice, word order, spacing, typography, etc. to identify recipients of documents.

>>nitrog+qj
Are you making an argument for a news agency to never reveal the contents of any leaks, ever? There's always some risk involved, and that's the price of leaking the truth and expecting people to believe you. How can we expect people to "do their research" and be critical of information, when the news agencies themselves won't reveal it, and instead are paraphrasing and interpreting it for us? That's nonsense.