Unfortunately this is the low bar set by a lot of modern journalism. We need a way out of it back to neutral, factual reporting.
Creating fact focused journalism is a laudible goal but I'd be curious of what specific time in history you think that this was generally the case?
To do so without commentary or comparison to factual reality is a kind of bias but feels neutral because it doesn't create contention in an individual's mind. There are exceptions such as Cronkite's broadcast after the Tet Offensive which I am not lauding or criticizing here, only to say it was out of the norm.