zlacker

[return to "Chinese authorities install app on phones of people entering Xinjiang"]
1. mdoraz+V2[view] [source] 2019-07-02 15:23:31
>>el_dud+(OP)
This bit is important: "Foreigners crossing certain Chinese borders into the Xinjiang region"...

I'm not aware of Chinese authorities getting quite that draconian (yet) at the normal border entry points in Beijing, Shanghai, etc. However, I think it's still worth following the general advice that if you have sensitive data on your devices, leave them at home and use a burner phone/laptop + restore from the cloud later.

◧◩
2. Burnin+md[view] [source] 2019-07-02 16:24:09
>>mdoraz+V2
OK, Xinjiang is basically a low level war zone/prison camp.

Quite different from the rest of China.

◧◩◪
3. dirtyi+ih[view] [source] 2019-07-02 16:46:34
>>Burnin+md
Rest of China is captured by wechat anyways. This is only really useful for foreign reporters travelling in XinJiang. China could technically just ban foreigners from travelling there but somehow thinks the optics of this is better.
◧◩◪◨
4. seanmc+ko[view] [source] 2019-07-02 17:28:01
>>dirtyi+ih
It is weird because there are no travel restrictions for foreigners going to Xinjiang (mostly, some places are off limits), you just buy a plane or train ticket. Going to Tibet is a lot harder for foreigners.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. dirtyi+Bp[view] [source] 2019-07-02 17:34:49
>>seanmc+ko
I think Tibet still very much has Western imagination captured whereas Uyghar Muslims... do not. Even more cynical analysis, Xinjiang is fundamentally an exercise in reducing the real problem of Islamic radicalization and the non response from many countries (including Muslim ones) is that they are quietly observing to see if the experiment pays off. The danger of Xinjiang is that surveillance state + "vocational" reintegration camps might actually be a productive model that can be exported elsewhere.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. seanmc+Tr[view] [source] 2019-07-02 17:46:54
>>dirtyi+Bp
Xinjiang is also much larger population (21 million+) wise than Tibet (3 million+), along with the former having a much larger Han population, making restrictions much harder (and less appealing) to implement logistically.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. Quercu+0L[view] [source] 2019-07-02 19:44:58
>>seanmc+Tr
I hope you mean population, not ovulation.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. seanmc+9L[view] [source] 2019-07-02 19:45:42
>>Quercu+0L
Yikes! Fixed.
[go to top]