zlacker

[return to "In Twitter’s early days, only one celebrity could tweet at a time"]
1. lunchb+Ex[view] [source] 2018-05-24 23:45:28
>>evanwe+(OP)
What frameworks would you use to handle such an steep growth curve? Most startups I know of start of with rails or the like - and obviously they couldn't handle the strain. So what would you use?
◧◩
2. phaedr+Fy[view] [source] 2018-05-24 23:58:02
>>lunchb+Ex
I would use Rails, but I wouldn't do things like try to write an asynchronous message queue in Ruby (like Twitter did).

I mean sites like Shopify, Hulu, YellowPages.com, etc. "handle the strain" just fine.

◧◩◪
3. mbrees+DE[view] [source] 2018-05-25 01:26:54
>>phaedr+Fy
How much of the content in those sites change as fast as Twitter does? Mainly static content can be displayed using about any framework/language. Moreso when you include caching. I don’t think Rails was simply a good choice for the workload Twitter needed to support (not that they knew it at the time).
[go to top]