zlacker

[return to "GDPR: Don't Panic"]
1. frereu+N2[view] [source] 2018-05-18 08:33:10
>>grabeh+(OP)
For those of you understandably intimidated by the GDPR regulations themselves, here's a good summary in plain English: https://blog.varonis.com/gdpr-requirements-list-in-plain-eng...

The UK's ICO also has a good structured summary: https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-the-general-da...

In general I agree with the sentiments in this article. I've probably spent a total of three to four days reading around the GDPR and I don't really see what's special about this law other than it's imposing decent standards on what was in effect a wildly unregulated industry in people's personal data. If you have a broad distrust of any government activity then I suppose any new laws with "fines up to €X" might feel like "I run a small site on a Digital Ocean droplet and I'm at risk of a €2m fine out of the blue." But that doesn't make it true.

◧◩
2. danthe+z4[view] [source] 2018-05-18 08:54:26
>>frereu+N2
The amount of discretion and lack of clarity in the penalties is part of the problem. It opens you up to risk based on the whims of politics and the regulators and increases uncertainty. Laws should be clear, limited, and understandable - this is not.
◧◩◪
3. lyscho+T6[view] [source] 2018-05-18 09:21:21
>>danthe+z4
The law says that the fines should be "effective, proportionate and dissuasive". That gives companies ample room to challenge a fine that is way out of proportion to the damages caused to their users.
◧◩◪◨
4. omgint+Od[view] [source] 2018-05-18 10:43:20
>>lyscho+T6
You say this as though "challenging a fine" were trivial.

After countless months spent in a courtroom and tens of thousands of Euros in legal fees, even if you win, you lose.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. yayana+ki[view] [source] 2018-05-18 11:45:47
>>omgint+Od
If you are fined 10k-100k you have the typical problem of whether it is worth fighting..

But you are supporting the argument that you could be illegally (according to article 83) fined 4 million euros as a first offence because a regulator wants to be disproportionate and set an example with your small company and then have costs of 10-100k to throw out an obvious case, but it wouldn't be worth it?

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. ghein+Sm[view] [source] 2018-05-18 12:35:45
>>yayana+ki
It's worth it but it bankrupts you.

No customers, no investors, and all your cash gone before your appeal is heard.

Block all EU traffic. Just cut the transatlantic cables.

[go to top]