zlacker

>>stable+(OP)
Can someone help me understand how this site is not sexist and discriminatory against men?

>>mychae+Di
Do you also consider separate men and women's bathrooms prejudicial and sexist?

>>jjeaff+xk
As defined by merriam-webster.com I certainly do. Why do we consider all sexism bad?

>>chrisl+pn
That's not the real question, you're pretending context doesn't matter. What's your argument? Women say "I enjoy having a place to communicate with other women in a place that feels safe from male interference," and your response is "Let me into the women's bathroom"?

>>rev_bi+wp
No. Having separate bathrooms for men and women is sexist, by definition. What I hoped for was discussion on whether all sexism is bad.

>>chrisl+Xy
No, having separate bathrooms is not sexist. Because the term sexism refers to negative issues only. Webster's uses the word "discrimination". Which I assume you are being pedantic and interpreting in a broader context like "discriminating between the colors blue and teal".

But lookup discriminate and it has a few meanings. One of which refers to prejudicial or unfair treatment. That is the definition implied when referring sexist discrimination.

>>jjeaff+Wj3
I don't agree. If sexism refers to the negative issues only then what is the word for the positive issues of dividing people up by sex?

>>chrisl+VH3
Gender distinction, gender separation

Every major dictionary specifically uses terms like "prejudice", "discrimination against", "stereotype". There is obviously a consensus that it is referring to negative/unequal treatment.