zlacker

>>sandsl+(OP)
Unfortunately, there is a bit too much unstated assumption of "just be lucky (fortunate) as hell in multiple metrics from an incredibly young age." This seriously undermines the value of this advice for at least 99% of people.

>>Mz+Y2
If one did state that assumption, is there something useful one can then say about how to be lucky? Or can you give an example of a "here's how I succeeded at something, the same strategies might work for you" article that addresses luck in an actionable way?

>>tlb+s4
There are actually studies that quantify some of the differences in behavior between people who are lucky and people who are not. I think the actionable advice here wouod have to do with what pre-conditions must exist before this advice is meaningful and useful. Having some idea of what kind of situation you must create for yourself first would make it easier for people to recognize whether or not this advice can be applied to their life and, if not, what personal issues need to be addressed before this is useful advice.

>>Mz+o6
Would love to read these studies, do you have some references?

>>YuriNi+n9
https://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/201005/make-your-ow...

http://www.bing.com/search?q=luck+studies&go=Submit&qs=n&for...

http://www.forbes.com/sites/michakaufman/2015/01/30/embracin...

http://www.codusoperandi.com/posts/increasing-your-luck-surf...