zlacker

Spotlighting the World Factbook as We Bid a Fond Farewell

submitted by mxfh+(OP) on 2026-02-04 21:08:35 | 158 points 109 comments
[view article] [source] [go to bottom]

NOTE: showing posts with links only show all posts
◧◩◪
17. oxfeed+Hk[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 22:55:48
>>sixdim+pi
It seems to be archived on the wayback machine, for example https://web.archive.org/web/20260203163430/https://www.cia.g...

It was available for online browsing or as a downloadable file, I think a zip compressed PDF. I’m sure copies are available, but it would be nice to have an authoritative source.

22. simonw+am[view] [source] 2026-02-04 23:04:00
>>mxfh+(OP)
Urgh, this is nasty:

  curl -i 'https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook'
  HTTP/2 302 
  content-length: 0
  location: https://www.cia.gov/stories/story/spotlighting-the-world-factbook-as-we-bid-a-fond-farewell/
They didn't even have the decency to give it a 410 or 404 error.

Same for all of the country pages - they redirect back to the same story: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/morocco/

The thing was released into the public domain! No reason at all to take it down - they could have left the last published version up with a giant banner at the top saying it's no longer maintained.

◧◩◪◨⬒
25. simonw+tm[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 23:05:17
>>themaf+Ji
Incorrect. The website was updated weekly: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World_Factbook#Frequency_o...
◧◩◪◨⬒
27. psykli+Bm[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 23:05:45
>>themaf+Ji
What is this then: https://web.archive.org/web/20260203163430/https://www.cia.g...

It clearly states on the page that the Factbook was continuously updated, with "new data uploaded this week".

35. joseph+sn[view] [source] 2026-02-04 23:11:13
>>mxfh+(OP)
Thank you Internet Archive - https://web.archive.org/web/20260103000011/https://www.cia.g...
41. itsrob+Rp[view] [source] 2026-02-04 23:25:21
>>mxfh+(OP)
This isn't ideal but the book is still in print:

https://www.amazon.com/CIA-World-Factbook-2025-2026/dp/15107...

I couldn't find a PDF or archive of the site online (other than the obvious archive.org) but I didn't look very hard.

◧◩◪◨
50. nl+ou[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 23:56:24
>>rbanff+si
> you shouldn’t expect it to be fair about any socialist or communist countries, usually classified as brutal dictatorships,

The World Fact Book doesn't have this kind of commentary. For example read the entry on North Korea. I've excerpted the most critical parts here, and I think they are a long way from your characterization:

> After the end of Soviet aid in 1991, North Korea faced serious economic setbacks that exacerbated decades of economic mismanagement and resource misallocation.

> New economic development plans in the 2010s failed to meet government-mandated goals for key industrial sectors, food production, or overall economic performance. At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, North Korea instituted a nationwide lockdown that severely restricted its economy and international engagement.

> As of 2024, despite slowly renewing cross-border trade with China, North Korea remained one of the world's most isolated countries and one of Asia's poorest

https://web.archive.org/web/20260103000011/https://www.cia.g...

51. simonw+ev[view] [source] 2026-02-05 00:00:29
>>mxfh+(OP)
I managed to pull a zip file archive of the 2020 edition from the Internet Archive - I've uploaded the contents of that zip file to this GitHub repo: https://github.com/simonw/cia-world-factbook-2020

And turned on GitHub Pages so you can browse it here: https://simonw.github.io/cia-world-factbook-2020/

◧◩◪◨
52. toomuc+gv[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-05 00:00:42
>>rbanff+7j
https://www.muckrock.com/
54. toomuc+Pv[view] [source] 2026-02-05 00:03:52
>>mxfh+(OP)
Potentially related:

https://www.wyden.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/wyden_letter_to_d...

◧◩
63. simonw+VF[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-05 01:23:13
>>crazyg+oF
It hasn't been a print-first publication in many years - the site was updated weekly.

It's also where a lot of the facts on Wikipedia came from. This is a real loss.

I trust CIA over official population numbers from a lot of countries. There was a thread on here recently that pointed out a lot of countries haven't conducted an effective census in many years, if at all: >>46810027

◧◩◪◨
64. simonw+dG[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-05 01:25:41
>>oxfeed+Hk
As far as I can tell the single zip downloadable versions stopped being published after 2020. I grabbed a copy of the 2020 zip from the Internet Archive and turned it into a GitHub repo here: https://github.com/simonw/cia-world-factbook-2020/
◧◩
68. Wowfun+XG[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-05 01:32:21
>>simonw+ev
The Github Pages website seems to be missing a lot of images? For example, if I go to https://simonw.github.io/cia-world-factbook-2020/geos/fr.htm... and then click "View 95 photos of FRANCE".
◧◩◪◨
69. cucumb+QH[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-05 01:38:59
>>slg+MG
I think it's a pretty strong condemnation of the CIA that they can't find something more important to flamboyantly kill though.

https://www.creators.com/read/thomas-sowell/03/13/budget-pol... (you can stop reading after the first couple paragraphs, it goes into federal budget politics circa 2013)

◧◩◪◨⬒
74. EarlKi+bK[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-05 01:57:23
>>simonw+dG
Just in case anyone else wants to poke around and discovers there appears to be archived versions after 2020[1]... don't bother. They all 404. At a guess: There were links to them in anticipation of creating updated zip files but they never got around to it. Lame.

[1] https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://www.cia.gov/the-world-...

◧◩
77. 0xDEAF+hO[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-05 02:33:17
>>jl6+yn
Maybe Our World in Data? https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/population?tab=map
◧◩
89. sagunt+271[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-05 05:37:45
>>itsrob+Rp
Thanks. Is this one officially not getting released?

https://www.amazon.com/dp/151078604X/

I was thinking it would be nice to have a final print edition for the book collection, Amazon seems to be under the impression that this newer version is coming out in April.

◧◩◪◨
96. stopbu+BL1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-05 11:41:37
>>throwa+In
The Power of Nightmares | Part 1: Baby It's Cold Outside | Adam Curtis F... https://youtube.com/watch?v=jxBbw13Y3Gc?t=32m54s :

> I don't believe anything in Team B was really true

> [...]

> Casey was convinced that there was a single, organized network of evil in the world, [...] He found the proof he was looking for in a book called The Terror Network

The Power of Nightmares | Part 2 : The Phantom Victory | Adam Curtis Ful... https://youtube.com/watch?v=KolgBqJ95ug?t=6m16s re: Casey, Reagan, Bush, Wolfowitz and why we've spent trillions saving the world from such dastardly evil since Carter's record-setting low EJK term (which was affected by oil price shock)

The Power of Nightmares: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_of_Nightmares

◧◩◪◨⬒
109. swed42+Xn2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-05 15:48:30
>>bdcrav+BK
The parent's point seems to be that since most voters of both corporate parties have pretty much universally internalized and accepted they're voting for the "lesser of two evils," it's safe to conclude our political system is captured and has been for decades. Furthermore, 1/3 of people refusing to vote is not solely out of laziness. Many of them have concluded the system is FUBAR.

We're given two shit options which come about through a broken primary process and is reported on by monopolistic media. The news media and social media is siloed in such a way that people filter into one of two corporation-approved spheres of groupthink. These two spheres manufacture consent for each other in numerous ways, one of which is exemplified above. The good cop/bad cop setup makes it look like things are constantly getting broken only to have the illusion of being re-fixed by the other group, as measured by a pre-approved narratives that are disseminated.

The COVID pandemic is another great example. Sadly the CDC has been a disgrace under all recent administrations of both parties and has lots of blood on its hands:

https://www.thegauntlet.news/p/how-the-press-manufactured-co...

Unfortunately the WHO has similar issues:

https://old.reddit.com/r/ZeroCovidCommunity/comments/1q87aki...

Almost as if capital interests are running the show. But what are we fighting about in 2026? That's right, whether we should or should not be affiliated with the WHO, and to what extent our CDC should be funded. Two broken institutions and a performative fight about them. Meanwhile millions have/will see their grave earlier than they otherwise would have, thanks to long COVID (many of whom will never even make that connection, including their doctors who were spoonfed the "vax and relax" / "back to normal" messaging in service to an archaic consumption-based economy.

[go to top]