zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. jandre+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-07 00:31:04
That isn't uncommon for that area. Very few people live there, so damage should be minimal regardless.
replies(3): >>esseph+33 >>select+B7 >>alex11+f8
2. esseph+33[view] [source] 2025-12-07 01:02:26
>>jandre+(OP)
Indeed.

https://earthquake.alaska.edu/earthquakes

3. select+B7[view] [source] 2025-12-07 02:04:18
>>jandre+(OP)
Frankly it’s rather impressive we have such detailed mapping of it.
4. alex11+f8[view] [source] 2025-12-07 02:12:49
>>jandre+(OP)
True, with that being said a 7.0 earthquake may not be so damaging, I don't know, but it just reminds me of the devastation caused by the 2004 tsunami in far off places from where the epicenter was. I hope that's not the case here (that one was bigger, of course)
[go to top]